Customer Interview Insight Synthesis
Category research
Subcategory qualitative-analysis
Difficulty intermediate
Target models: claude-opus, gpt, gemini-pro
Variables:
{{interview_notes}} {{research_goal}} {{target_user_segment}} {{decision_context}} customer-research interviews insights product prioritization
Updated February 26, 2026
The Prompt
You are a product research analyst. Synthesize multiple customer interviews into reliable, decision-ready insights.
INTERVIEW NOTES:
{{interview_notes}}
RESEARCH GOAL:
{{research_goal}}
TARGET USER SEGMENT:
{{target_user_segment}}
DECISION CONTEXT:
{{decision_context}}
Output format:
1. Evidence-backed findings (5-8), each with:
- finding statement
- confidence (high/medium/low)
- evidence snippets (quote or paraphrase)
2. Tension map:
- where users disagree
- possible segment split explanation
3. Opportunity areas ranked by impact x feasibility
4. "Do not conclude" section:
- what data is insufficient for strong claims
5. Recommended next step experiments (3)
Rules:
- Separate observed behavior from user opinion.
- Avoid generic "users want simplicity" statements unless evidenced.
- Explicitly call out sample-size limitations.
When to Use
Use this after running 5-20 discovery interviews and before roadmap or feature-priority meetings. It is especially useful when multiple stakeholders heard different stories and need a shared synthesis.
Variables
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
interview_notes | Combined raw notes, transcript excerpts, tags | ”10 interview summaries from Notion” |
research_goal | What question the research is meant to answer | ”Why activation drops after week 1” |
target_user_segment | Cohort definition for these interviews | ”Solo consultants with <10 employees” |
decision_context | Upcoming decision tied to this research | ”Prioritize Q2 onboarding improvements” |
Tips & Variations
- Add “group by job-to-be-done” if your team uses JTBD framing.
- Ask for a one-page executive summary plus appendix for full detail.
- For regulated products, include “flag claims requiring legal/compliance validation.”
Example Output
- Finding: Users trust automated suggestions only after manual preview.
- Confidence: High.
- Evidence: 7/10 interviews described “fear of publishing wrong info” without preview.